| |
Private Annuity Regulations |
|
|
|
| |
Welcome to another edition of Cox & Nici's E-News
where we inform you about current legal issues that
may affect you and your loved ones.
|
|
| |
|
Private Annuity Trust...Problems?
On October 17, 2006, the IRS introduced Proposed
Regulations which, if ultimately enacted in the same
or similar form, would significantly affect the taxation
of some limited types of transactions involving private
annuities entered after October 18, 2006, and some
other limited types of transactions involving private
annuities entered after April 18, 2007.
Importantly, the Proposed Regulations do not
eliminate private annuities or even the most common
types of transactions involving private annuities.
Instead, the IRS sought to address a certain type of
transaction that the IRS considered to be particularly
abusive, which was the so-called "Private Annuity
Trust" ("PAT") transaction. In a PAT, sellers
essentially exchange appreciated assets (such as
Real Estate) for fixed annuity payments, which
spread out their capital-gains taxes over many years.
The idea had been to avoid paying the upfront capital
gains that would have otherwise been owed if the
seller simply had sold the asset outright. Instead, the
seller had been taxed on the annuity payments when
they came out of the trust, effectively spreading out
the taxes over a longer period.
|
|
|
| |
|
Abusive Transaction?
The transactions that the Proposed Regulations
identify as abusive generally contain one or more of
the following features:
(1) The Trust or other entity that purchased the
property by way of a private annuity transaction was
owned or controlled either by the annuitant or by the
close family of the annuitant;
(2) The Private Annuity payments were secured
(either directly or indirectly);
(3) The property had already been agreed to be sold
or placed in escrow to a true third-party buyer prior
to the time that the Private Annuity Trust was
implemented, and the Private Annuity Trust was only
inserted in the middle of the transaction to attempt
to avoid or defer taxes.
|
|
|
| |
|
Summary
It should be noted that not all transactions involving
private annuities and trusts are either considered to
be abusive, or are impermissible after the release of
the new Proposed Regulations. Indeed, many of the
most useful private annuity transactions were not
significantly affected by the Proposed Regulations
(i.e., transactions entered into for valid non-tax
reasons such as estate planning and passing down a
closely-held business). For instance, private annuity
transactions to trusts that are taxed as grantor
trusts are largely unaffected and those private
annuities remain permissible.
In any event, there should be no concern for anyone
who entered into a Private Annuity Trust already as
long as it was funded before October 18th. However,
if you are now contemplating entering into a private
annuity transaction, it might be a good time to have
the transaction reviewed to determine whether there
are issues that should be addressed in light of the
Proposed Regulations.
|
|
|
| |
Thank you for reading this issue of Cox & Nici's
E-News. Please visit our website or call us for more
information regarding this subject or to answer any
other questions you may have.
If you wish to contact Joe B. Cox or James R.
Nici directly, DO NOT REPLY to this
email! Regarding legal inquiries, contact Joe B. Cox
at jcox@coxnici.com
or James R. Nici at jnici@coxnici.com
.
Reply to this email for technical assistance
only!
Sincerely,

Joe B. Cox, Esq. & James R. Nici, Esq.
Cox & Nici
phone:
239-254-0706
|
|
|